Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 09:50

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Smoking Weed and Eating Edibles Share This Surprising Health Risk - Gizmodo
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Scientists delve into Hells Canyon cave to solve mystery of America's deepest gorge - Live Science
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
How do you handle family members who ask for handouts?
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
I can not sleep. what is the problem?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Fatty liver: Symptoms and warning signs seen during the night - Times of India
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
George E. Smith, Nobel laureate who envisioned digital imagery, dies at 95 - The Washington Post